|
Ongoing Concerns with Peer Evaluation
Although agreement in principle was quickly attained, agreement in practice
was not. Several faculty members remained convinced that they did not
have time to put together their teaching materials in a way that made
them accessible to an outside reviewer, especially if they had to explain
what they were trying to do. Nonetheless, the department is continuing
to work toward a system of course portfolios, along with a checklist that
can be used by outside reviewers who are looking at the portfolio
|
The biggest concern: IT TAKES TOO LONG TO PUT ALL
THIS STUFF TOGETHER!
What are we doing? Were working toward the
development of course portfolios, to be done over time and turned in by
faculty members every second or third year, not every year.
|