|
The six general standards for scholarship
below
seem an excellent wrap-up of our work in the tutorial.
George
Walker comments
on
standards
for SOTL
|
Clear Goals
Does the scholar state the basic purpose of
his or her work clearly? Does the scholar define objectives that
are realistic and achievable? Does the scholar identify important
questions in the field?
Adequate Preparation
Does the scholar show an understanding of existing
scholarship in the field? Does the scholar bring the necessary skills
to his or her work? Does the scholar bring together the resources
necessary to move the project forward?
Appropriate Methods
Does the scholar use methods appropriate to
the goals? Does the scholar apply effectively the methods selected?
Does the scholar modify procedures in response to changing circumstances?
|
Significant Results
Does the scholar achieve the goals? Does the
scholars work add consequentially to the field? Does the scholars
work open additional areas for further exploration?
Effective Presentation
Does the scholar use a suitable style and effective
organization to present his or her work? Does the scholar use appropriate
forums for communicating work to its intended audiences? Does the
scholar present his or her message with clarity and integrity?
Reflective Critique
Does the scholar critically evaluate his or
her own work? Does the scholar bring an appropriate breadth of evidence
to his or her critique? Does the scholar use evaluation to improve
the quality of future work?
Glassick, C.E., Huber, M.T., Maeroff, G.I,. 1997 Scholarship
Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass.
|
|